Services · 15 ways across one gap

All services

Work · proof, not promises

All case studies

Insights · street talk, written down

Magazine

Company · AI Expertise since 2011

About Voidgap

SecureS.02 · Claude Code Security

Allow all.Allow list.

Claude Code with real permissions needs real guardrails

Agents that edit files, run commands and touch production credentials need a permission model, policies and review workflows. Not trust.

Deliverables
4
Process
4 steps
Self-check
4 questions
Move
Secure
permission model · .claude/settingssample output
actionallowaskdeny
Read src/**
Edit src/**
Run tests
git push
Read .env*
curl external hosts
rm -rf
Deploy to production

An agentic coding tool that can edit files, run commands and reach the network is a colleague with root access and no onboarding.

The actual risk

The risk is rarely the model writing bad code; review catches that. It is the agent doing things around the code: reading an .env file, running a destructive command, pushing to a branch, calling an external URL with data it should not send, following instructions hidden in a README it just opened. Defaults are built for convenience, not for your threat model.

What guardrails look like

A permission model per repository and risk level: what is allowed, what needs approval, what is denied. Secrets kept out of reach. Network access limited. Hooks and CI checks that enforce the rules instead of trusting them. An audit trail of what the agent changed and who approved it.

A colleague with root access and no onboarding.

How we set it up

One workshop with your dev leads to see how the tools are really used. A permission model and secrets strategy that fit your risk profile. Configured policies and CI checks, implemented together with your engineers. And a half-day session so the team understands the rules and the reasons, which is what keeps them followed.

02 · Sound familiar?

Tick what’s true.

0 of 4. Lucky you — or not honest yet.

03 · Self-check

How exposed
is your team?

Four questions about how agentic coding tools are used today.

  1. 01
    How many developers use agentic coding tools?

  2. 02
    What can the agent reach?

  3. 03
    Is there a policy?

  4. 04
    Would you know what the agent changed last week?

04 · What you get

What’s on the table
at the end.

Every engagement ends with things you can open, run or hand to an auditor. Not a slide saying we were there.

  1. 01Usage & risk assessmentHow it is used today
  2. 02Permission modeland a policy draft
  3. 03Configured policiesand CI checks
  4. 04Playbookand an onboarding session

05 · How it runs

4 steps.
No mystery.

What you get at each step, and what we need from you. Nothing else.

  1. 01Assess current usage

    you getRisk assessment

    from youWorkshop with dev leads

  2. 02Design guardrails

    you getPermission model + secrets strategy

    from youReview

  3. 03Implement & wire in

    you getConfigured policies

    from youPaired with your engineers

  4. 04Enable the team

    you getPlaybook

    from youHalf-day session

06 · Fit check

Honest about
who it’s for.

Right for you if

  • Your team uses Claude Code and security has gaps
  • Agents touch broad resources
  • Secrets live in readable repos
  • Someone asks for an AI audit trail

Not for you if

  • You want to ban AI coding tools
  • Nobody uses agentic coding yet

Next step · Claude Code Security

What is your agent allowed to do today?

A first call about your void. No deck. If it isn’t a fit, you’ll hear that too.