Implementation Sprint
2–4 weeks typical start
- Idea to production
- End-to-end delivery of one use case
Services · 15 ways across one gap
All servicesWork · proof, not promises
All case studiesShipped lately sample data
Insurance · DACHClaims triage agent40 % of inbound, automatedFintechKYC review agentExceptions onlyMediaArchive search & tagging1.2 M assets, findableEnterpriseAgent security audit2 critical → 0Trusted by
Insights · street talk, written down
MagazineCompany · AI Expertise since 2011
About VoidgapWho we are
We don’t close the gap. We move in.
DACH · --:--:-- · shipping
How to hire us
Idea to production · built for real users
Production is data, integrations, permissions, monitoring and an owner. We build all of it, inside your systems.
One system travels through seven gates on its way to production: demo, data, integrations, guardrails, evals, monitoring, production.
01 · Why demos die
AI projects rarely fail on the model. They fail on everything around it.
A demo runs on twelve hand-picked examples, a laptop and someone who knows which questions to ask. Production runs on thousands of real inputs, in systems with permissions, on a Tuesday when the person who built it is on holiday.
Real data flowing in, including the ugly cases. Integrations into the systems where the work happens. Guardrails and fallbacks for when the model is wrong or unsure. Evals on every change. Monitoring that someone looks at, and an owner who gets the call when it breaks. Legal and security involved at the start, not at launch.
We start with constraints: data, systems, rules, people. Then architecture and model choice, tested against your data rather than benchmarks. We build in sprints inside your stack, with your engineers where possible, and stay for the first weeks after launch until the system is boring.
Boring is the goal.
02 · The gap
The same model on both sides. Everything else is different, and everything else is the work.
| Aspect | Production | |
|---|---|---|
| Inputs | Twelve hand-picked examples | Thousands of real inputs, including the ugly ones |
| Runs on | A laptop | Your systems, with their permissions |
| Operated by | The person who built it | Your team, on a Tuesday, while the builder is on holiday |
| When the model is wrong | Someone reruns it | Guardrails, fallbacks, and a person for consequential steps |
| Quality | Looks good in the meeting | Evals on every change, with a gate |
| When it breaks | Nobody notices | Monitoring, alerts and an owner |
| Legal & security | Show up at launch | Involved from the start |
| Cost | Nobody asked | Cost per transaction, visible, with alerts |
It worked in the demo, then fell over on the inputs production actually gets.
No owner, no monitoring, no feedback loop, so nobody knows it is broken.
Legal and security see it for the first time at launch, and stop it.
Usage was never measured. Costs exploded before value showed up.
Good answers, poor integrations. The work still happens by hand.
Wrong answers reach users, with no guardrail and no fallback.
03 · Process
Constraints first, code second. Safety before launch, not after the first incident.
Data, systems, rules and people. What exists, who owns it, what must not happen.
System design and model choice, tested against your data rather than benchmarks.
Sprints inside your stack, wired into the systems where the work happens.
Guardrails, fallbacks and an evaluation suite that gates every change.
Go-live with monitoring, then iteration until the system is boring.
04 · Outcomes & formats
Three things, whichever format you choose. The format decides how much of the knowledge stays inside your team.
Live users, real transactions, measurable impact.
Your team can debug and iterate without us.
Cost per transaction, visible, with alerting.
2–4 weeks typical start
4–8 weeks
first 30 days after go-live
Solid: the minimum. Hatched: the range, depending on scope. The strips are illustrative.
05 · Self-check
Four questions that decide what the first sprint looks like.
The idea needs a sharper problem and a data check before code. A strategy sprint saves you a failed build.
Two to four weeks from pilot to production for one use case.
Four to eight weeks embedded with your engineers, so the knowledge stays.
01What exists today?
Where you start decides the first sprint.
02Is the data accessible?
Most delays are data access, not modelling.
03Are security and legal involved?
Late involvement is the most common launch blocker.
04Do you have engineers to build with?
Building together keeps the knowledge in-house.
06 · Fit
Implementation starts with a use case worth building. Without one, other work comes first.
07 · Questions
Whatever fits your constraints: hosted models through EU endpoints, open models in your own cloud, or a mix. We choose per task, test against your eval set rather than benchmarks, and keep the model swappable.
Only where your contract and policy allow it. We design for EU processing by default, and for tenant-internal setups where the data demands it.
Where possible, yes. Build With Your Team puts us inside your team for four to eight weeks, so the knowledge stays when we leave.
Launch & Stabilize covers the first 30 days, until the system is boring. Then your team owns it: code, evals, dashboards and runbooks.
No. We build systems for real users. A demo built to impress is exactly the thing that dies in production.
Start with a Workshop or AI Strategy. Implementation starts with a validated use case.
08 · How to hire us
Pick by where you are: deciding, stuck with a live system, or ready to build.
Half or full day. Ends with decisions, owners and next steps.
When you need to decide
Retainer, fix-it sprints, embedded help. For systems that are live and hurting.
When a live system hurts
Two- to eight-week builds. From validated idea to real users.
When you are ready to build
What’s stuck between demo and production?
Tell us what exists today: an idea, a demo, a pilot with real users. We come back with the first sprint.