Services · 15 ways across one gap

All services

Work · proof, not promises

All case studies

Insights · street talk, written down

Magazine

Company · AI Expertise since 2011

About Voidgap

ComplyC.01 · EU AI Act Readiness

200-page memo.Roadmap.

The EU AI Act applies to you. Here’s your path through it.

Risk classification of your AI systems, the obligations that actually apply, and a pragmatic compliance plan — without a 200-page legal memo nobody reads.

Deliverables
3
Process
4 steps
Self-check
4 questions
Move
Comply
risk classification · sample inventorysample output
  1. ProhibitedArt. 5Emotion recognition at work
  2. High riskAnnex IIICV screeningCredit scoring
  3. Limited risktransparencyCustomer chatbot
  4. Minimal riskno new dutiesSpam filterCode assistant

The EU AI Act is long. The part that applies to you is usually short, once you know which systems you have and what role you play.

Where the Act starts

The regulation sorts AI systems by risk: prohibited practices, high-risk systems, systems with transparency duties, and the rest. It also separates providers, who place a system on the market, from deployers, who use it. Your obligations depend on both. They phase in over several years; some already apply, including the prohibitions and AI literacy.

Why companies get stuck

Nobody has a complete list of AI systems, including the ones inside vendor tools. Classification needs someone who understands both the law and the system. And the output is often a legal memo that nobody in engineering can turn into work. Meanwhile sales receives questionnaires asking for exactly this documentation.

Engineering-grade, not legalese.

How we approach it

Inventory first, including vendor integrations. Then classification per system, with the reasoning written down and reviewed with your legal counsel. A gap analysis against the obligations that apply, ranked by effort. And a dated roadmap with owners, templates and an evidence checklist, handed over in a workshop with legal and engineering together.

Not legal advice. We work alongside your legal counsel.

02 · Sound familiar?

Tick what’s true.

0 of 4. Lucky you — or not honest yet.

03 · Self-check

Where do you stand
with the AI Act?

Four questions about inventory, classification, sensitive use cases and customer pressure.

  1. 01
    Do you have a list of your AI systems?

  2. 02
    Is each system classified?

  3. 03
    Do you use AI in HR, credit or similar decisions?

    These are the use cases most likely to be high-risk.

  4. 04
    Are customers asking?

04 · What you get

What’s on the table
at the end.

Every engagement ends with things you can open, run or hand to an auditor. Not a slide saying we were there.

  1. 01System inventory & risk classesEvery system mapped, with the reasoning
  2. 02Obligation gap analysisWhat applies, what’s met, what’s missing
  3. 03Compliance roadmapDated, with owners, templates and an evidence checklist

05 · How it runs

4 steps.
No mystery.

What you get at each step, and what we need from you. Nothing else.

  1. 01Inventory

    you getComplete AI system inventory

    from youInterviews with team leads

  2. 02Classify

    you getPer-system risk class

    from youReview with your legal counsel

  3. 03Gap analysis

    you getGap report + ranked backlog

    from youOne working session

  4. 04Roadmap & handover

    you getDated compliance roadmap

    from youHandover with legal and engineering

Next step · EU AI Act Readiness

Which of your systems is high-risk?

A first call about your void. No deck. If it isn’t a fit, you’ll hear that too.