Get your team past the AI-assisted coding honeymoon phase
Everyone can generate code with an AI assistant in week one. The workshop is about week twelve, when the shortcuts have compounded and nobody remembers writing half the codebase.
Sound familiar?
- Developers accept AI-generated code without reading it, then debug it as if they had written it themselves.
- Review processes were built for human-authored code and miss the failure modes AI assistants introduce.
- Teams have no shared standard for when to trust, edit or reject a suggestion.
- Velocity looks great in week one and cratering by week eight, and nobody can say why.
What we do
Working with the assistant, not for it
Prompting, iterating and context-management techniques that produce code worth keeping, not just code that compiles.
Reading AI-generated code critically
The specific bug classes and anti-patterns AI assistants reproduce, and how to spot them in review before they ship.
Team conventions that scale
A concrete review checklist and usage policy your team can adopt the next working day, not a slide left in a folder.
Measuring what actually improved
Simple metrics for whether AI-assisted coding is making your team faster or just making it feel faster.
Framework
- Duration
- 1 day (approx. 7 hours incl. breaks)
- Group size
- 8-12 participants
- Format
- In-house at your site or remote
- Prerequisites
- Working professional programming experience; any AI coding assistant is welcome.
- Who it's for
- Software engineers using or evaluating AI coding assistants
- Investment
- on request (fixed in-house day rate)
Agenda
- Prompting and iteration techniques for real production tasks
- Context management for large, existing codebases
- Failure modes: the bug classes AI assistants reproduce
- Building a team review checklist for AI-generated code
- Drafting a team usage policy
- Measuring velocity and quality impact honestly
Questions we get
Which tools do you cover?
We work tool-agnostic and use whatever your team already runs — GitHub Copilot, Cursor, Claude Code or others. The techniques transfer across tools.
Is this a coding bootcamp?
No. We assume your engineers can already code. This is about the judgment layer on top of AI-assisted coding, not programming fundamentals.
Can this connect to a Vibe Coding Audit later?
Yes, several teams run the workshop first to build shared standards, then use the audit to check whether an existing codebase already violates them.
Tell us what's running in production.
We'll tell you what we'd check first — and what we wouldn't bother with.
Book a call